GCSE
English Language
2.2.5 Question 5: 40 Marks (AO5 – 24 Marks, AO6 – 16 Marks)
In this lesson, you’ll learn how to answer GCSE English Language Paper 2, Question 5. We’ll focus on crafting persuasive and effective writing in different forms, developing clear arguments with evidence, and using accurate grammar, structure, and techniques to secure up to 40 marks.
Paper 2: Question 5
Section B presents Question 5, the persuasive writing task. Here you must produce a piece of extended writing (usually an essay, article, letter, speech, etc.) where you express your viewpoint on a given statement or topic. This is worth 40 marks – half the exam’s marks – with 24 marks for content and organisation, and 16 marks for technical accuracy (spelling, punctuation, grammar, sentence structure).
You’ll be given a prompt, often a short statement or quote to respond to, and a specific form and audience. For example: “‘School uniforms should be abolished.’ Write a letter to your headteacher arguing your point of view on this statement.” Or “Write an article for a news website in which you explain your views on the importance of volunteering.” Here is what will be required:
- Clear viewpoint: You need to have a stance – either agree, disagree, or a nuanced take (e.g. ‘I somewhat agree…’, ‘I slightly disagree…’) – and stick to it consistently, supporting it with reasons and examples.
- Awareness of purpose, form, audience: Tailor your style to what the task asks. A speech might include direct address (“Ladies and gentlemen, …”, “Teachers,...”), an article might have a catchy headline, a letter would need addresses and a greeting (“Dear ...”). The tone should fit the audience: e.g. writing to a headteacher is formal/polite, writing for peers can be a bit more informal but still clear.
- Persuasive/argumentative techniques: Since these tasks often ask you to argue or explain a viewpoint, use rhetorical devices to engage and convince. This can include: rhetorical questions, emotive language, statistics or facts (you can invent believable ones), anecdotes, direct address (“Imagine if you…”), repetition for effect, rule of three, counter-arguments (acknowledging the other side then refuting it), and strong conclusions.
- Good organisation: A well-structured response with an introduction, clear paragraphs each covering a point, and a conclusion. Use connective phrases to link ideas (furthermore, in addition, on the other hand, however, for example, as a result, etc.).
- Technical accuracy: Use a range of sentence types (some short for impact, some complex for detail), accurate spelling, varied vocabulary, and correct punctuation. Show off some skills like using a semi-colon or colon correctly, or a dash for effect, as well as ensuring basics (full stops, commas in the right places) are all correct. You also want to keep the writing lively – avoid a monotonous sentence start like “I think…” repeatedly. Mix it up with questions, exclamations (sparingly, if appropriate), and descriptive lines if relevant.
Continue the lesson
This section is available to learners with course access. Continue learning with Knowness to unlock the full explanation, examples, revision tools, and progress tracking.
The remaining lesson content includes further guided explanation, important learning points, and supporting interactive material designed to help you understand and revise this topic.
Unlock this topic to view the full activity, worked examples, common mistakes, and additional revision support.
More content available
Knowness lessons are structured to build understanding step by step. Create an account or upgrade your access to continue from this point.
This preview does not include the hidden lesson text, answers, explanations, or embedded interactions.
Continue learning with Knowness
Sign up to access the full lesson, predicted grades, revision tools, progress tracking, and more.
Create a free accountPaper 2: Question 5
- Worth 40 marks: 24 marks for AO5 (content and organisation) and 16 marks for AO6 (technical accuracy).
- Task: Extended writing (e.g., essay, article, letter, speech) expressing a viewpoint on a given statement or topic.
- Requires a clear stance (agree, disagree, or nuanced) maintained consistently and supported with reasons and examples.
- Must show awareness of purpose, form, and audience, adapting style accordingly (e.g., speech uses direct address, letter uses correct greeting and sign-off).
- Persuasive/argumentative techniques to use include rhetorical questions, emotive language, statistics, anecdotes, direct address, repetition, rule of three, counter-arguments, and strong conclusions.
- Organisation should include an introduction, clear paragraphs for each main point, and a conclusion; use connectives to link ideas.
- Technical accuracy requires varied sentence structures, correct spelling, accurate punctuation, and a wide vocabulary; show control of more advanced punctuation such as colons, semi-colons, and dashes.
Approaching Question 5
- Read the question carefully and identify the form, audience, and topic.
- Decide your stance and stick to it (nuance allowed but avoid fence-sitting).
- Plan for 3–4 main points, possibly including a counter-argument.
- Arrange points logically, with a strong opening and closing.
- Include examples or evidence (personal experiences, statistics, hypothetical scenarios).
- Write in paragraphs with topic sentences and linking phrases.
- Use engaging, audience-appropriate language and persuasive devices.
- Proofread at the end to correct errors and improve clarity.
- Aim for 350–450 words to develop ideas fully without rambling.
