GCSE

Geography

0 / 76 Lessons
0%
  1. Introduction to GCSE Geography (AQA)
  2. 1. Living with the Physical Environment

  3. 1.1 The Challenge of Natural Hazards
  4. 1.2 The Living World
  5. 1.3 Physical Landscapes in the UK
  6. 2. Challenges in the Human Environment
  7. 2.1 Urban Issues and Challenges
  8. 2.2 The Changing Economic World
  9. 2.3 The Challenge of Resource Management
  10. 3. Geographical Applications
  11. 3.1 Issue Evaluation
  12. 3.2 Fieldwork
  13. 4. Geographical Skills
  14. 4.1 Cartographic Skills
  15. 4.2 Graphical Skills
  16. 4.3 Numerical Skills
  17. 4.4 Statistical Skills
  18. 4.5 Use of Qualitative and Quantitative Data
  19. 4.6 Formulate Enquiry and Argument
  20. 4.7 Literacy
Module Progress
0 / 76 Lessons
0%
Learning
Study

If we know about the location and severity of natural disasters, why don’t we just live outside these areas? This lesson will explore why people continue to live, despite the risk and how monitoring, prediction, protection, and planning can help mitigate these risks.

Why Take the Risk?

Despite the risks associated with tectonic hazards, people often choose to live in areas prone to such events due to various factors:

  • Historical and Cultural Reasons: Long-standing settlements and cultural ties to the region may influence people’s attachment to their homeland, even in hazardous areas. Furthermore, historical resilience and adaptation to past hazards may instil a sense of confidence in facing future events.
  • Economic Opportunities: Hazard-prone areas may offer economic advantages such as fertile soils for farming, natural resources for mining, or proximity to trade routes, making them attractive for livelihoods and economic activities. Tourists also visit places like Iceland and Naples because of their tectonic activity. Finally, tectonic activity can also be harnessed for geothermal energy, giving countries cheap, renewable energy. There are also limited alternative options or economic constraints that may restrict people’s ability to relocate to safer areas.
  • Lack of Awareness or Perception: Limited knowledge about the specific risks or the perception that the benefits outweigh the hazards may contribute to people’s decision to remain in risk areas. Also, inadequate information, educational campaigns, and risk communication efforts may hinder individuals’ understanding of the potential dangers.

These risks however can be mitigated through monitoring, prediction, protection, and planning.

Monitoring

Monitoring systems, such as seismographs, tiltmeters/GPS, and satellite technology, can detect and measure the movements of tectonic plates, providing valuable data for early warning systems and hazard assessment.

Figure 21. The Hawaiian Volcano Observatory.

Volcano monitoring networks can track changes in volcanic activity, including gas emissions, ground deformation, and seismicity, aiding in the prediction of eruptions.

Prediction

While it is challenging to predict precise timings and magnitudes of tectonic events, in particular earthquakes which can often give almost no warning, ongoing research and monitoring efforts contribute to improved forecasting capabilities. Early warning systems can provide vital seconds or minutes of advance notice before an earthquake or volcanic eruption, enabling evacuation and emergency preparedness.

Figure 22. Early warning sirens in Malaysia.

Historical data analysis can also create trends to help us predict. For example, if an area that historically has earthquake activity on a 5-year basis, experiences no earthquakes within 5 years, we assume that one may be coming shortly.

Protection

Structural measures, such as designing earthquake-resistant buildings or implementing land-use planning regulations, can reduce the vulnerability of infrastructure and communities. LICs (Lower Income Countries) struggle to do this.

Figure 23. A rebuilt Cathedral in Chile, designed to be earthquake-resistant.

Additionally, volcanic hazard mapping and the establishment of exclusion zones around active volcanoes can help protect people from pyroclastic flows, ashfall, and other volcanic hazards.

Planning

Effective disaster management plans and emergency response strategies are crucial for coordinated actions during and after a tectonic hazard event. Incorporating risk assessments, land-use planning, and zoning regulations into urban and regional planning processes can help steer development away from high-risk areas.

Key